TS-ogn

Toyota Sportscar - Owners Group Norway 

  • Nyheter og updates om ft86/gt86/86/frs

  • Generell diskusjon / "off topic" emner, media, annonser på Finn.no, video fra YouTube osv
Generell diskusjon / "off topic" emner, media, annonser på Finn.no, video fra YouTube osv
 #401576  av Julebrus
 
Tror det kan være noe som er galt som gjør det verre. Har sakt fra til Toyota på tidligere servicer men har ikke funnet noen feil.
Nå skal bilen på service i dag, så får vente og se. Ellers sender jeg bilen til en jeg kjenner som skrur Drag Racere, finner ikke han feilen finner ingen den :P
 #401584  av inzane2012
 
du er en merkelig skrue du Julebrus :) det med vingling har nok mye mer med di aerodynamiske egenskapene til bilen enn akkurat vekta, for ta ett ekstremt eksempel, bare se på en F1 bil, en bil som veier i underkant av 600kg og hvor di beste har ca 800hk i V8'ern sin men som fint hadde passert 400kmt på testbana til VW, og tror ikke disse vingler så mye i høye hastigheter :P
 #401588  av bose
 
Chill litt nå da! ;) Vi har da alle våre meninger og ingen er mer tullete enn den andre, spørs bare på øyet som ser ;)

Men i dette tilfellet her julebrus; så tror jeg det faktisk kan være et problem med hjulstillinga de, evnt så kan det fåretases småe grep for å betraktelig øke stabiliteten i høy fart.. Og dette har ikke med vekt å gjøre.


inzane2012: En F1 bil veier nok vesentlig mer enn 600kg når den gjør 400km/h... ;)
 #401594  av RESOKEI
 
litt mer teknisk info fra katalogen er lekket:

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2131

lenge siden jeg har gleden meg til en ny produsert bil, men denne her har hatt det rette fokuset hele veien, ikke POWER more power! , men kjøreegenskaper og kjørefølese. ikke den raskest bilen, men blir helt sikkert en av de morsomste i sin prisklasse.

en kommentar på facebook:

Saw this on my facebook feed from Moto and Tetsuya Tada...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moto via facebook

Chief Engineer, Mr.Tada of TOYOTA wrote to me today.
I'll roughly translate the message:
---

We had a chance to have Mr.Keiichi Tsuchiya test drive our production car today, and he commented as follows...

"The car (FT86) is not only FUN to drive, but in terms of quality and precision of handling, the car has very much surpassed any expectations I had. More easily put, if you had blind folded me and told me this was a new creation by BMW's M department, I would not even hesitate to believe you. It's that good."

---

Happy now? I'm thrilled because I just sold my own BMW M3 a few months ago in preparation to buy an FRS.
 #401598  av inzane2012
 
bose skrev:Chill litt nå da! ;) Vi har da alle våre meninger og ingen er mer tullete enn den andre, spørs bare på øyet som ser ;)

Men i dette tilfellet her julebrus; så tror jeg det faktisk kan være et problem med hjulstillinga de, evnt så kan det fåretases småe grep for å betraktelig øke stabiliteten i høy fart.. Og dette har ikke med vekt å gjøre.


inzane2012: En F1 bil veier nok vesentlig mer enn 600kg når den gjør 400km/h... ;)
joda, den får ganske heftig marktrykk i 400kmt, men så sa jeg at det var ett ekstremt eksempel og da ;) tror ikke den vingler noe særlig i 120kmt heller ;)
 #401616  av Drafter
 
inzane2012 skrev:du er en merkelig skrue du Julebrus :) det med vingling har nok mye mer med di aerodynamiske egenskapene til bilen enn akkurat vekta, for ta ett ekstremt eksempel, bare se på en F1 bil, en bil som veier i underkant av 600kg og hvor di beste har ca 800hk i V8'ern sin men som fint hadde passert 400kmt på testbana til VW, og tror ikke disse vingler så mye i høye hastigheter :P
Du er klubbleder og moderator, likevel snakker du mer off topic her enn noen andre på forumet. :lol:
Er du som er en merkelig skrue her, nicolay
 #401627  av RESOKEI
 
H-RES IMAGE:
frsleak4.jpg
frsleak4.jpg (259.23 kiB) Vist 4881 ganger
INTERIOR
ftinterior2.jpg
ftinterior2.jpg (341.32 kiB) Vist 4880 ganger
newfrs6.jpg
newfrs6.jpg (157.34 kiB) Vist 4878 ganger
 #401629  av RESOKEI
 
Her er 2 tester av testbilen for ft86.


Toyota FT-86 coupe (2012) CAR review

By Ben Barry

28 October 2011 10:55




On 20 May 2011, CAR was allowed behind the wheel of a Toyota FT-86 development mule to get our own driving impressions and to give feedback to Toyota’s engineers during a secretive test session in Germany. Now, as the car is about to be unveiled at the 2011 Tokyo motor show, it’s time to reveal all.

Where does the Toyota FT-86 name come from?

‘FT’ means Future Toyota, and is a label given to Toyota concept cars. The ‘86’ plays on the Toyota Corolla GT Coupe, the 1.6-litre DOHC, rear-wheel drive coupe that enthusiasts refer to by its AE86 chassis-code. The implication, then, is that the FT-86 is a 21st century AE86.

The FT-86 tag will be dropped for production. At the time of our drive, there was still a great deal of debate as to what the car would be called. The engineers were very keen on the AE86 link, while the marketeers thought that very few people would know what that symbolised – they preferred Celica. It is, however, likely that an 86 suffix will appear in some markets.

What's the specification of the new Toyota FT-86?

The key info here is that Toyota is developing the FT-86 in tandem with Subaru, who will also sell the car, in much the same way that Citroen, Toyota and Peugeot sell the C3/Aygo/107. So, this explains why the FT-86 uses a Subaru 2.0-litre flat-four engine that produces around 200bhp and 170lb ft. Unlike pretty much everyone else these days, Toyota has shunned turbocharging, but the engine does benefit from Toyota’s D4S direct injection, which helps towards a C02 figure of around 160g/km – a similarly powerful Renaultsport Clio manages 190g/km.

The engine is mounted up front, but low and relatively far back in the engine bay. It’s mated to a close-ratio Aisin gearbox (as used by Toyota elsewhere), while a Torsen rear differential sits between the driven rear wheels. The overall weight distribution is 53/47% front to rear, while the production car will weight around 1200kg.

The platform is newly developed, and I managed to put eight of my size 11 footsteps between the front and rear wheelhubs, giving a wheelbase of around 2400mm – similar dimensions to a Mini hatchback.

Elsewhere, there’s MacPherson strut front suspension, and a double wishbone rear-end. Mitsubishi supplies the springs, while test cars ran both Sachs and Showa shock absorbers – we tested the Sachs set-up.

What's the FT-86 like inside?

You sit low down – lower than a Porsche Cayman, claim the engineers – and squish into a comfortable seat with leather bolsters and grippy suede centres. The driving position is excellent. The FT-86 is strictly a 2+2: there was no room whatsoever for my legs in the back with a six-feet-tall driver in the front.

The rest of the interior was still heavily camouflaged but we did see aluminum finishes on the rotary climate control dials, plus a row of aluminium-topped switches. Toyota’s ‘keyless go’ is standard, but we couldn't see the zip-up dashboard cover like on the concept car, forum watchers take note!

What's the 2012 Toyota FT-86 like to drive?

It’s great fun. There’s fantastic throttle response, quick, well weighted steering and a nice firm brake pedal. Add little inputs to the steering when you’re driving in a straight line at speed and the front end darts immediately – no slop, no roll, it’s just 100% obedient and alert.

Clearly, it’s not a GT-R chaser, but that’s the whole point – the focus here is on dynamics you can explore at lower speeds. The flat-four zings happily and spins round the dial to 7500rpm, at which point you get a flashing light and a well-judged soft rev limiter – not a sudden cut-out. Doesn’t sound much like a flat-four though – perhaps this is intentional, as the flat-four sound is such a Subaru trademark.

The gear ratios are closely stacked, and help to keep this modestly powered 2.0-litre spinning, but the ratios are well chosen so as not to be tiresome: 60mph in sixth gear brings up 2500rpm – relatively high, yes, but not daft. The gearshift could be slicker, but the lever has an engagingly short throw.

Even without sliding it around, the FT-86 is very obviously rear-wheel drive: get to the limit in a second-gear corner and accelerate harder and you feel the back end point the front back exactly where you want it. It responds well to a really aggressive driving style. Shame that the stability controls’ Sport setting was too intrusive, although Toyota’s engineers said they had a less intrusive set-up that they were also experimenting with.

It must be a blast to slide around…

Drifting is a huge part of the appeal of the FT-86, just as it continues to be for the AE86. Our car was fitted with 215/45 R17 Michelin Green X tyres all round – aka Toyota Prius tyres. This made it laughably sideways in second gear, the back end stepping out with relatively mild – and sometimes almost no – provocation. For the average driver, this makes exploring the limits far easier than in anything else currently on sale.

However, at higher speeds I found the balance less pleasing. In fast third-gear turns, for instance, the front end feels too soft and errs towards understeer – it could be pointier, firmer and more positive. Under provocation, the rear then comes around, but the FT-86 is so short that this transition can be very quick. Two factors then come into play: the first is the Torsen diff, which is more refined in day-to-day driving, but less precise than a mechanical differential when the rear tyres are struggling for purchase, so the level of control you have over the sliding rear end is compromised; the second point is the lack of power: adding power during slides helps you to bring things back under control, but in a high-speed FT-86 you’re more in the hands of momentum than you are able to dictate things with the throttle.

So the FT-86's a hooligan oversteer specialist?

At one point I found myself snapping into very fast oversteer, then suddenly snapping back and making an out-of-control excursion across the run-off area. My mistake, yes, but I’ve never had this feeling in any other modern rear-wheel drive car, 911 GT3 included.

Is there going to be an FT-86 with more power and a mechanical differential?

Turbocharging the flat-four would be straightforward (after all, that’s what Subaru does with the Impreza), but chief engineer Tetsuya Tada told us that he ‘doesn’t like turbos’ and has ‘decided to reject the numeric power war’. He also said that an R version of the FT-86 was coming with less weight, Brembo brakes (our test car’s stoppers were from Hitachi), a rollcage, a larger rear wing, no rear seats and, yes, a mechanical LSD but no more power.

And bear in mind that Toyota had invited us for our input and that this was a fairly early car – things will be tweaked for production. Our cars were still disguised, although pictures of the FT-86 production car have leaked out in recent days.

Other options are also on the cards: a convertible is ‘possible’, while an auto gearbox is confirmed – it’s a six-speed unit based on the eight-speeder in the high-performance Lexus ISF.

Verdict

The Toyota FT-86 is great news for enthusiasts: it’s affordable, frugal and relatively practical. You also don’t have to be a driving deity to explore its limits. If anything, we’d adjust the high-speed, on-limit balance (firmer front end, more progressive transition into oversteer, tighter differential), but that doesn’t undo the underlying fact that this is a great car, and one that trounces its closest rival, the Mazda MX-5, in the fun stakes.




http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Drives/...2-CAR-review-/


AUTOCAR REVIEW

Toyota FT-86 2.0 First Drive

Test date Friday, October 28, 2011

Price as tested £20,000

What is it?

We’ve been waiting a long time for the Toyota FT-86. Literally, because we’ve seen a lot of the concept. But figuratively, too: Toyota is promising the FT-86 will deliver a return to sports car purity that is driven by feel and intuition, not lap times and lateral grip levels. We’ve wanted a car like that for a long while.

“Sports cars have gotten boring,” Toyota says. “They’re only interested in going fast.” The FT-86 is meant to amend that, to bring speeds down but take the enjoyment up, not unlike the Caterham 7 Supersport which we’ve fallen for recently.

The FT-86 is on a new platform that has been co-developed with Subaru (whose Subaru BRZ will be distinctly similar). We still don’t have all the technical details because it’s some way from launch – sales start in June 2012, following the production car’s unveiling at the end of November 2011.

What I can tell you is that it’s “as small as possible for a four-seater sports car,” which means it weighs 1280kg. It has a 2.0-litre flat-four petrol engine in the front, naturally aspirated, which is supplied by Subaru but gets Toyota’s D4-S direct injection system. It makes 197bhp.

The key things to add are these: it drives the rear wheels through a six-speed manual gearbox and a Torsen limited-slip differential. And the tyres are the same modest 215/45 R17 items you’ll find on a Toyota Prius.

Oh, and the ESP can be completely switched off.

What’s it like?

As much fun as you’d hope. I drove a disguised car on a deserted airfield last May (wasn’t supposed to be able to tell you about it until the end of November, but recent revelations have brought that forward a bit ), and it still makes me smile to think about it now.

First impressions: it feels light and compact, a bit like an MX-5. The driving position is low, straight and snug, with grippy front seats (and not a lot of room in the back).

The Toyota FT-86 feels quick enough, too, with a precise if a touch notchy gearchange, and an engine note that’s a bit growly – there’s not much flat-four burble. Tweaking the NVH is high on Toyota’s ‘to-do’ list. It has a broad power curve - it revs to 7500 but there’s no desperate need to wind it that far past the mid-range.

It’s hard to accurately guage the ride on a concrete airfield, but the FT-86 feels quite deftly set-up, light on its feet, with a touch of tyre roar that’s to be expected.

It steers easily too. At 2.5 turns lock-to-lock the steering’s quick without being hyperactive, and is light-to-middling in weight. It all adds to the impression that this is going to be an easy car to get along with.

Find a corner and you’ll find some roll, but its rate is well contained. The FT-86’s weight distribution is 53/47 per cent front/rear, so it’ll nudge into steady-state understeer if you’re on a constant throttle, where it grips moderately well and is pleasingly poised.

The great thing about the FT-86 though is, as promised, it really handles. It lets you choose how you want to corner. Add any amount of power and it’ll turn at least neutral. Trail the brakes into a bend, give a mid-corner throttle-lift or, well, just give the steering a bit of a bung and lots of throttle and it’ll either straighten its line or give you armfuls of oversteer, utterly as you prefer.

There’s still a bit of tweaking to do on the damping, but it’s 90 per cent of the way there. As it is, in third gear the FT-86 will run out of power to keep a long slide going (if you like that sort of thing), so inevitably it takes momentum rather than power to play games with the chassis. But if you add more power to compensate then you’ll want a turbo and bigger stoppers too, and that adds weight, and, well – that’s where the downward spiral starts, right?

“The key development for the FT-86 is that it’s a front-engined, rear-drive car with intuitive handling,” says Toyota.

“A fun car is a car you can control. We rejected the idea of a car developed using numbers. It must have front-engine/rear-drive, a naturally-aspirated engine and a low centre of gravity.”

Should I buy one?

I suspect those who do won’t regret it. The Toyota FT-86 will need a change in attitude: this car’s not about delivering ultimate acceleration or lap times, it’s just about having fun.

The FT-86’s modest limits and power mean that it should prove enjoyable on the road: you’ll be able to get more out of it, more often, than you could a much faster and more theoretically capable sports car, whose reward is more often than not limited by visibility and sensibility.

It’d be terrific fun on a track day, too. It’s light enough to not wear out its consumables quickly and, while an FT-86 wouldn’t be the fastest way around a circuit, there aren’t too many cars out there – certainly not at its predicted £20k-odd price tag – that could put a bigger smile on their driver’s face.

Matt Prior

Price: 20,000 (est); Top speed: n/a; 0-62mph: n/a; Economy: n/a; Co2: n/a; Kerbweight: 1280kg; Engine type: 2.0-litre, four-cylinder petrol; Power: 197bhp; Torque: n/a; Gearbox: six-speed manual

http://www.autocar.co.uk/CarReviews/...-drive/259779/
 #401667  av sindrejl
 
Julebrus skrev:
bose skrev:
Julebrus skrev:Er litt som Amerikanere, liker å kjøre fort rett frem. :wink:

Supra har en passe vekt på 1,5.
Ikke for å virke frekk her nå , men da er ikke du i kundegruppa til FT86, eller andre konkurerende biler i samme klasse.. Og Supra er ikke en sportsbil i ordets rette forstand. men en "GT Cruiser" med god motor.. ;)
Har ikke noe problem med lette biler, men dem begynner og vingle i 130+

Når jeg kjører i 120 sona i Sverige pleier jeg og ligge i 140-145, og da synes jeg IS200 vingler ganske mye av lufttrykket.
Bryr meg ikke, men litt irriterende når man skal kjøre 20-30mil :wink:
Du vet at den vinglinga kommer ikke pga vekt, men pga dårlig dekkvalg, dekk som sporer, eller mykt og dårlig understell. En Is200 har nada problemer med å holde god fart over tid uten vingling. Kjørte en Honda S2000 nedover sveits ifjor, denne veier 1200kg. Kjørte kontinuerlig rundt 170kmt og det eksisterer ikke vingling, lav bil såklart, men det er jo noe av det som gjør en sportsbil sportslig. Skal ikke være stor, tung, høy muskelbunt av en amerikaner. Er jo en grunn til at alle som kjører Supra på bane letter dem for vekt :)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 35